Twelve-month effectiveness and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in people with HIV from the Canadian cohort of the observational BICSTaR study.

The BICSTaR (BICtegravir Single Tablet Regimen) study is investigating the effectiveness and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treated in routine clinical practice. BICSTaR is an ongoing, prospective, observational cohort study across 14 countries. Treatment-naïve (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) people with HIV (≥18 years of age) are being followed for 24 months. We present an analysis of the primary endpoint (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL; missing-equals-excluded [M = E]) at month 12 in the BICSTaR Canada cohort, including secondary (CD4 count, CD4/CD8 ratio, safety/tolerability) and exploratory (persistence, treatment satisfaction) endpoints. In total, 201 participants were enrolled in the BICSTaR Canada cohort. The analysis population included 170 participants (TN, n = 10; TE, n = 160), with data collected between November 2018 and September 2020. Of the participants, 88% were male, 72% were White, and 90% had ≥ 1 comorbid condition(s). Median (quartile [Q]1-Q3) age was 50 (39-58) years and baseline CD4 count was 391.5 (109.0-581.0) cells/µL in TN participants and 586.0 (400.0-747.0) cells/µL in TE participants. After 12 months of B/F/TAF treatment, HIV-1 RNA was < 50 copies/mL in 100% (9/9) of TN-active participants and 97% (140/145) of TE-active participants (M = E analysis). Median (Q1-Q3) CD4 cell count increased by +195 (125-307) cells/µL in TN participants and by + 30 (-50 to 123) cells/µL in TE participants. Persistence on B/F/TAF was high through month 12 with 10% (1/10) of TN and 7 % (11/160) of TE participants discontinuing B/F/TAF within 12 months of initiation of treatment. No resistance to B/F/TAF emerged. Study drug-related adverse events occurred in 7% (12/169) of participants, leading to B/F/TAF discontinuation in 4 of 169 participants. Improvements in treatment satisfaction were observed in TE participants. B/F/TAF demonstrated high levels of effectiveness, persistence, and treatment satisfaction, and was well tolerated through month 12 in people with HIV treated in routine clinical practice in Canada.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in children aged 2 years and older with virologically suppressed HIV: a phase 2/3, open-label, single-arm study.

BACKGROUND: Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide is a single-tablet regimen and was efficacious and well tolerated in children and adolescents with HIV (aged 6 years to <18 years) in a 48-week phase 2/3 trial. In this study, we report data from children aged at least 2 years and weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. METHODS: We conducted this open-label, multicentre, multicohort, single-arm study in South Africa, Thailand, Uganda, and the USA. Participants were virologically suppressed children with HIV, aged at least 2 years, weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. Participants received bictegravir (30 mg), emtricitabine (120 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (15 mg) once daily, switching to bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) upon attaining a bodyweight of at least 25 kg. The study included pharmacokinetic evaluation at week 2 to confirm the dose of coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for this weight band by comparing with previous adult data. Primary outcomes were bictegravir area under the curve over the dosing interval (AUCtau) and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ctau) at week 2, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory abnormalities until the end of week 24 in all participants who received at least one dose of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02881320. FINDINGS: Overall, 22 participants were screened (from Nov 14, 2018, to Jan 11, 2020), completed treatment with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (until week 48), and entered an extension phase. The geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio for AUCtau for bictegravir was 7·6% higher than adults (GLSM ratio 107·6%, 90% CI 96·7-119·7); Ctau was 34·6% lower than adults (65·4%, 49·1-87·2). Both parameters were within the target exposure range previously found in adults, children, or both". Grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities occurred in four (18%) participants by the end week 24 and six (27%) by the end of week 48. Drug-related adverse events occurred in three participants (14%) by the end of week 24 and week 48; none were severe. No Grade 3-4 adverse events, serious adverse events, or adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred by the end of week 24 and week 48. INTERPRETATION: Data support the use of single-tablet coformulated bictegravir (30 mg), emtricitabine (120 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (15 mg) for treatment of HIV in children aged at least 2 years and weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Switch to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide from dolutegravir-based therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 96 weeks of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) treatment in participants switching from dolutegravir (DTG)-based therapy. DESIGN: Studies 1489 (NCT02607930) and 1490 (NCT02607956) were phase 3 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, first-line therapy trials in people with HIV-1. After 144 weeks of DTG-based or B/F/TAF treatment, participants could enter a 96-week open-label extension (OLE) of B/F/TAF. METHODS: A pooled analysis evaluated viral suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml) and changes in CD4 + cell count at OLE Weeks 48 and 96, treatment-emergent resistance, safety, and tolerability after switch from a DTG-based regimen to B/F/TAF. Outcomes by prior treatment were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared by two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: At OLE Week 96, participants who switched to B/F/TAF ( N  = 519) maintained high levels of virologic suppression (99.5 and 99.1% in those switching from DTG/abacavir/lamivudine and DTG+F/TAF, respectively) and CD4 + cell count, with no treatment-emergent resistance to B/F/TAF. Twenty-one participants experienced drug-related adverse events after switching, with diarrhea, weight gain, and headache occurring most commonly. There were no cases of proximal renal tubulopathy, drug-related Grade 4 adverse events, or serious adverse events. Two participants discontinued B/F/TAF due to treatment-related adverse events. Participants who switched from DTG/abacavir/lamivudine experienced statistically significant greater weight gain than those who switched from DTG+F/TAF; however, median weight change from the blinded phase baseline to OLE Week 96 was numerically similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This medium-term analysis demonstrates the safety and efficacy of switching to B/F/TAF from a DTG-containing regimen in people with HIV-1.

Adverse drug reactions attributed to generic substitution of antiretroviral medications among HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis clients in British Columbia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: In British Columbia, antiretrovirals (ARVs) for HIV treatment (HIV-Tx) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are free-of-charge through publicly-funded Drug Treatment Programs (DTPs). When available, less costly generics are substituted for brand-name ARVs. We describe the incidence and type of product substitution issue (PSI) adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to generic ARVs. METHODS: Cohorts included DTP clients ≥19 years who received generic ARVs for HIV-Tx (abacavir-lamivudine, emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, atazanavir or darunavir between 01 Jun 2017 and 30 Jun 2022) or PrEP (emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, 01 Apr 2018 to 30 Jun 2022). Demographic, ARV and ADR data were extracted from DTP databases and summarized by descriptive statistics. PSI incidence was calculated for each product during the year following brand-to-generic and generic-to-generic transitions (first-year-post-rollout), and compared between generic versions using generalized estimating equations. For context, incidence of any ARV product-related ADR was calculated in the same 1-year periods. RESULTS: During first-year-post-rollout periods, 5339 HIV-Tx (83% male, median age 52 years) and 8095 PrEP (99% male, median 33 years) clients received generic ARVs, and reported 78 and 23 generic PSIs, respectively. PSI incidence was <1% for most generic ARVs, with mild-moderate symptoms including gastrointestinal upset, headache, dizziness, fatigue/malaise and skin rash. In HIV-Tx clients, the efavirenz-containing product had higher PSI incidence than other ARVs (2.2%, p = .004), due to more neuropsychiatric adverse reactions. Any ADR incidence was stable across measurement periods, and generic PSIs represented less than one third of all product-related ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Generic substitution of antiretrovirals for HIV-Tx and PrEP was well tolerated, with ≤2% incidence of mild-moderate PSI ADRs.

Acute facial neuralgia related to initiation of emtricitabine/tenofovir for HIV PrEP: a report of two cases in a PrEP demonstration trial.

BACKGROUND: Emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) fixed-dose combination (FTC/TDF) is generally well-tolerated, although treatment-related adverse events have been reported. METHODS: We report two cases of persons using FTC/TDF PrEP who had acute neuralgia in a Chinese PrEP demonstration trial. RESULTS: Neurological symptoms subsided upon treatment discontinuation. Symptoms were reported as similar to one case's previous experiences with dolutegravir (DTG)+FTC+tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) (for PEP), leading to permanent discontinuation of PrEP. CONCLUSION: Acute facial neuralgia appears to be a rare idiosyncratic adverse event to FTC/TDF.

Efficacy and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate for adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1 in China: a retrospective real-world cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect and tolerance of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (BIC/FTC/TAF) use for 24 weeks in anti-retroviral therapy (ART)-naïve patients in China. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included ART-naïve patients who received BIC/FTC/TAF from July 2021 to April 2022. The proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at the end point of 24 weeks (virological suppression rate) was the primary outcome, and the changes in CD4 cell count, CD4/CD8 ratio, weight, blood lipid, and safety were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 80 ART-naïve patients were enrolled. The virological suppression rate was 86.3% at 24 weeks. The median CD4 cell count increased from 212 cells/µL (interquartile range [IQR]: 90.3-398.3) at baseline to 348 cells/µL (IQR: 219.8-541.0) at 24 weeks. The median CD4/CD8 ratio increased from 0.25 (IQR: 0.13-0.37) at baseline to 0.40 (IQR: 0.26-0.66) at 24 weeks. During the follow-up of 80 ART-naïve patients using BIC/FTC/TAF, 16 participants had adverse events; however, these events did not lead to drug withdrawal. CONCLUSION: This real-world cohort study showed that BIC/FTC/TAF could achieve good immunological and virological responses in ART-naïve patients. In addition, this study also shows good safety.

Effectiveness and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in HIV late presenters.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of BIC/FTC/TAF in HIV late presenters initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) has not been sufficiently evaluated. METHODS: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of BIC/FTC/TAF compared to other first-line antiretroviral regimens in treatment-naïve adult individuals from the CoRIS Cohort starting ART with CD4 counts <200 cells/mm3 and/or AIDS-defining conditions between January 1st 2019 and November 30th 2020. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of association between initial regimen and achievement of viral suppression (VS) (primary objective), defined as HIV RNA <50 cop/mL, and immunological recovery (IR) (secondary objective), defined as CD4 count >200 cells/mm3, at weeks 24 and 48 after initiation of ART. RESULTS: We evaluated 314 individuals (84.7% men, median age 40 years). Of them, 158 initiated with BIC/FTC/TAF. At inclusion, 117 had an AIDS-defining condition. In multivariable analyses, individuals with AIDS-defining conditions initiating ART with BIC/FTC/TAF achieved higher rates of VS at 24 weeks than other regimens (aOR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.06-0.64) and, at 48 weeks, than DTG/ABC/3TC (aOR: 0.06; 95% CI: 0.01-0.76) and DTG + TDF/3TC (aOR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.47-0.9). No other differences in VS or IR were observed. At 24 and 48 weeks after ART initiation, treatment discontinuations were lower with BIC/FTC/TAF than with other regimens (3.2% and 7.6% vs. 24.4% and 37.8%, respectively; P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that BIC/FTC/TAF could be a preferred regimen as initial therapy in HIV late presenters because of its high effectiveness and good tolerability.

Twelve-month effectiveness and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in people with HIV: Real-world insights from BICSTaR cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence is an essential component of evidence-based medicine. The aim of the BICSTaR (BICtegravir Single Tablet Regimen) study is to assess effectiveness and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in antiretroviral treatment-naïve (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) people with HIV. METHODS: BICSTaR is a prospective, observational cohort study. Participants (≥18 years) are being followed for 24 months. A pooled analysis is presented at 12 months, with the primary endpoint of effectiveness (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) and secondary endpoints of safety and tolerability (as per protocol). An exploration of patient-reported outcome measures using standardized questionnaires is included. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and May 2021, 1552 people with HIV were enrolled across 12 countries. The analysed population comprised 1509 individuals (279 TN, 1230 TE); most were white (76%), male (84%) and had one or more comorbid conditions (68%). Median age was 47 years. After 12 months of B/F/TAF treatment, HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in 94% (221/236) of TN participants and 97% (977/1008) of TE participants. Median CD4 cell count increased by 214 cells/µL (p < 0.001) in TN participants and 13 cells/µL (p = 0.014) in TE participants; median CD4/CD8 ratios increased by 0.30 and 0.03, respectively (both p < 0.001). Persistence was high at 12 months (TN, 97%; TE, 95%). No resistance to B/F/TAF emerged. Study drug-related adverse events occurred in 13% of participants through 12 months, leading to B/F/TAF discontinuation in 6%. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide robust real-world evidence to support the broad use of B/F/TAF in both TN and TE people with HIV.

Efficacy and safety of long-acting cabotegravir compared with daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine to prevent HIV infection in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men 1 year after study unblinding: a secondary analysis of the phase 2b and 3 HPTN 083 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Injectable cabotegravir was superior to daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine for HIV prevention in two clinical trials. Both trials had the primary aim of establishing the HIV prevention efficacy of long-acting injectable cabotegravir pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine daily oral PrEP. Long-acting PrEP was associated with diagnostic delays and integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance. This report presents findings from the first unblinded year of the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 083 study. METHODS: The HPTN 083 randomised controlled trial enrolled HIV-uninfected cisgender men and transgender women at elevated HIV risk who have sex with men, from 43 clinical research sites in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the USA. Inclusion criteria included: a negative HIV serological test at the screening and study entry, undetectable HIV RNA levels within 14 days of study entry, age 18 years or older, overall good health as determined by clinical and laboratory evaluations, and a creatinine clearance of 60 mL/min or higher. Participants were randomly allocated to receive long-acting injectable cabotegravir or daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine PrEP. After study unblinding, participants remained on their original regimen awaiting an extension study. HIV infections were characterised retrospectively at a central laboratory. Here we report the secondary analysis of efficacy and safety for the first unblinded year. The primary outcome was incident HIV infection. Efficacy analyses were done on the modified intention-to-treat population using a Cox regression model. Adverse events were compared across treatment groups and time periods (blinded vs unblinded). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02720094. FINDINGS: Of the 4488 participants who contributed person-time to the blinded analysis, 3290 contributed person-time to the first unblinded year analysis between May 15, 2020, and May 14, 2021. Updated HIV incidence in the blinded phase was 0·41 per 100 person-years for long-acting injectable cabotegravir PrEP and 1·29 per 100 person-years for daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine PrEP (hazard ratio [HR] 0·31 [95% CI 0·17-0·58], p=0·0003). HIV incidence in the first unblinded year was 0·82 per 100 person-years for long-acting PrEP and 2·27 per 100 person-years for daily oral PrEP (HR 0·35 [0·18-0·69], p=0·002). Adherence to both study products decreased after study unblinding. Additional infections in the long-acting PrEP group included two with on-time injections; three with one or more delayed injections; two detected with long-acting PrEP reinitiation; and 11 more than 6 months after their last injection. Infection within 6 months of cabotegravir exposure was associated with diagnostic delays and INSTI resistance. Adverse events were generally consistent with previous reports; incident hypertension in the long-acting PrEP group requires further investigation. INTERPRETATION: Long-acting injectable cabotegravir PrEP retained high efficacy for HIV prevention in men and transgender women who have sex with men during the first year of open-label follow-up, with a near-identical HR for HIV risk reduction between long-acting injectable cabotegravir and daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine PrEP during the first year after unblinding compared with the blinded period. Extended follow-up further defined the risk period for diagnostic delays and emergence of INSTI resistance. FUNDING: Division of AIDS at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences.

A four-drug combination oral tablet of darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Darunavir (DRV)/cobicistat (COBI)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is the only protease inhibitor-based single-tablet regimen (STR) approved for the treatment of HIV infection of adults and pediatric patients weighing at least 40 kg. DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF has demonstrated to be an effective regimen, to have a high genetic barrier to resistance, and to be well tolerated. AREAS COVERED: The authors summarize the chemistry and pharmacology of DRV, COBI, FTC, and TAF and discuss trials conducted on antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and -experienced people living with HIV designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the STR. This work also reports studies comparing DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF with competitive agents in real-world settings. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the availability of newer antiretroviral drugs and strategies in the management of HIV infection, including long-acting therapies, DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF is still considered an alternative regimen for the treatment of ART-naïve adults. DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF is an effective, well-tolerated, and safe antiretroviral regimen and represents a valid option for people who need to switch therapy due to tolerability issues, such as the onset of neuropsychiatric effects related to integrase strand transfer inhibitors, or virological failure.

Tolerability of bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine versus dolutegravir/lamivudine as maintenance therapy in a real-life setting.

BACKGROUND: While both the burden of therapy and the individual drugs in bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (BIC/TAF/FTC) and dolutegravir/lamivudine differ, it is unclear whether their real-life tolerability may be also different. METHODS: Single-centre, clinical cohort analysis of all virologically suppressed persons with HIV (PWH) who were first prescribed bictegravir as BIC/TAF/FTC or dolutegravir as dolutegravir/lamivudine and had taken ≥1 dose of study medication. Major outcomes were discontinuations either for any reason or due to toxicity. Incidence was calculated as number of episodes per 100 person-years adjusted through propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Relative to persons treated with BIC/TAF/FTC (n = 1231), persons treated with dolutegravir/lamivudine (n = 821) were older and had more AIDS-defining conditions although better HIV control. After a median follow-up of 52 weeks, adjusted incidence rates for discontinuation were 6.68 (95% CI 5.18-8.19) and 8.44 (95% CI 6.29-10.60) episodes per 100 person-years for BIC/TAF/FTC and dolutegravir/lamivudine, respectively; adjusted incidence rate ratio for dolutegravir/lamivudine was 1.26 (95% CI 0.89-1.78) relative to BIC/TAF/FTC (P = 0.1847). Adjusted incidence rates for discontinuation due to toxicity were 3.88 (95% CI 2.70-5.06) and 4.62 (95% CI 3.05-6.19) episodes per 100 person-years for BIC/TAF/FTC and dolutegravir/lamivudine, respectively; adjusted incidence rate ratio for dolutegravir/lamivudine was 1.19 (95% CI 0.75-1.90) relative to BIC/TAF/FTC (P = 0. 4620). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were neuropsychiatric (n = 42; 2%), followed by gastrointestinal (n = 23; 1%), dermatological (n = 15; 1%) and weight increase (n = 15; 1%), without differences between regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to BIC/TAF/FTC or dolutegravir/lamivudine showed no difference in the risks of overall or toxicity-related discontinuations or in the profile of adverse events leading to discontinuation.

Adherence, safety, and choice of the monthly dapivirine vaginal ring or oral emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among African adolescent girls and young women: a randomised, open-label, crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Half of new HIV acquisitions in Africa occur in adolescent girls and young women. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine or the monthly dapivirine vaginal ring is efficacious but has lower adherence and effectiveness among adolescent girls and young women. We aimed to assess product adherence, safety, and choice of oral PrEP compared with the dapivirine ring among African adolescent girls and young women. METHODS: MTN-034/REACH was a randomised, open-label, phase 2a crossover trial among HIV-seronegative, non-pregnant adolescent girls and young women aged 16-21 years at four clinical research sites in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the dapivirine ring or daily oral PrEP (200 mg of emtricitabine and 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) for 6 months, then switched to the other product option for 6 months, followed by a third 6-month period in which participants were given a choice of oral PrEP, the dapivirine ring, or neither. Fixed block randomisation was used, stratified by site. The primary adherence endpoint was use of each product during the randomised periods, with high use defined as tenofovir-diphosphate concentrations greater than or equal to 700 fmol/punch (associated with taking an average of four or more tablets per week in the previous month) and greater than or equal to 4 mg dapivirine released from the returned ring (continuous use for 28 days in the previous month) based on residual drug concentrations. The primary safety endpoint was grade 2 or higher adverse events during each randomised period of 24 weeks of ring and oral PrEP. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03593655. FINDINGS: From Feb 6, 2019 to Sept 9, 2021, 396 adolescent girls and young women were screened, 247 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned (6 months of the ring followed by 6 months of oral PrEP n=124; 6 months of oral PrEP followed by 6 months of the ring n=123). Median age was 18 years (IQR 17-19). 54 grade 2 or higher product-related adverse events were reported during oral PrEP and five during dapivirine ring use, with no product-related serious adverse events. High adherence was observed in 753 (57%) of the 1316 oral PrEP visits and 806 (57%) of the 1407 dapivirine ring visits. Four women acquired HIV during follow-up. INTERPRETATION: Adherence was moderately high and similar between oral PrEP and the dapivirine ring with favourable safety and tolerability. Oral PrEP and the dapivirine ring are effective, safe, and well tolerated HIV prevention options for adolescent girls and young women who would benefit from a choice of PrEP formulations to meet their needs and preferences. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.

Lipid profile changes associated with antiretroviral therapies in a real-world cohort. / [Artículo traducido] Cambios en el perfil lipídico asociados con las terapias antirretrovirales en una cohorte de vida real.

OBJECTIVE: To compare lipid profile changes and cardiovascular events among HIV naïve and experienced patients from a real-world cohort treated with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate or dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study in HIV naïve and experienced people at a reference hospital in Spain was done. During the follow-up (March 2015-June 2019), patients were treated with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate or dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine. Epidemiological, clinical and immunovirological variables were recorded. A statistical analysis of the lipid profile at baseline, 48 and 120 weeks after initiating the study therapy, cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, deep venous thrombosis, myocardiopathy, non-ST- segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) and cardiovascular risks factors was performed. Data were analysed in naïve and experienced patients from each of the study treatments. The data was obtained from the medical history. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v.24 software. RESULTS: A total of 266 and 191 patients receiving treatment with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate and dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine were included in the study, respectively. After 120 weeks of treatment, a worsening of the lipid profile was found in the elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate group, both in naïve and experienced patients, whereas not so conspicuously observed in the dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine group. Statistically significant differences between both groups were found in experienced patients favoring dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine; in total cholesterol (204.1 ± 38.2 vs. 187.3 ± 29.4, p < 0.001) and LDL-C (126.1 ± 31.9 vs. 113.5 ± 28.5, p = 0.001) at week 48, and in total cholesterol (201.1 ± 33.4 vs. 188.7 ± 33.9, p = 0.013) and HDL-C (54.2 ± 15.6 vs. 48.3 ± 14.3, p = 0.01) at week 120. No significant differences in cardiovascular events were found, neither in naïve nor in experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS: The lipid profile among elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate group worsened throughout the follow-up, both in naïve and experienced patients, not so remarkable in the dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine group. Both regimens were well tolerated, with similar rates of cardiovascular events.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine versus continuing fixed-dose bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed adults with HIV, 12-month results (SOLAR): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is the only approved complete long-acting regimen for the maintenance of HIV-1 virological suppression dosed every 2 months. The SOLAR study aimed to compare long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine every 2 months with continued once-daily bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for the maintenance of HIV-1 virological suppression in adults living with HIV. METHODS: SOLAR is a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3b, non-inferiority study. The study was done in 118 centres across 14 countries. Participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL were randomly assigned (2:1), stratified by sex at birth and BMI, to either long-acting cabotegravir (600 mg) plus rilpivirine (900 mg) dosed intramuscularly every 2 months or to continue daily oral bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg). Participants randomly assigned to long-acting therapy had a choice to receive cabotegravir (30 mg) plus rilpivirine (25 mg) once daily as an optional oral lead-in for approximately 1 month. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with virological non-response (HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies per mL; the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm, 4% non-inferiority margin; modified intention-to-treat exposed population) at month 11 (long-acting start with injections group) and month 12 (long-acting with oral lead-in group and bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04542070, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: 837 participants were screened between Nov 9, 2020, and May 31, 2021, and 687 were randomly assigned to switch treatment or continue existing treatment. Of 670 participants (modified intention-to-treat exposed population), 447 (67%) switched to long-acting therapy (274 [61%] of 447 start with injections; 173 [39%] of 447 with oral lead-in) and 223 (33%) continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide. Baseline characteristics were similar; median age was 37 years (range 18-74), 118 (18%) of 670 were female sex at birth, 207 (31%) of 670 were non-White, and median BMI was 25·9 kg/m2 (IQR 23·3-29·5). At month 11-12, long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine showed non-inferior efficacy versus bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies per mL, five [1%] of 447 vs one [<1%] of 223), with an adjusted treatment difference of 0·7 (95% CI -0·7 to 2·0). Excluding injection site reactions, adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between groups. No treatment-related deaths occurred. More long-acting group participants had adverse events leading to withdrawal (25 [6%] of 454 vs two [1%] of 227). Injection site reactions were reported by 316 (70%) of 454 long-acting participants; most (98%) were grade 1 or 2. INTERPRETATION: These data support the use of long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine dosed every 2 months as a complete antiretroviral regimen that has similar efficacy to a commonly used integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based first-line regimen, while addressing unmet psychosocial issues associated with daily oral treatment. FUNDING: ViiV Healthcare.

Tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in HIV-infected patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently, two-drug antiretroviral regimens are emerging fields in life-long treatment in people living with HIV. OBJECTIVES: This randomized non-inferiority open-label controlled trial was designed to compare the 48-week efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir versus the standard triple therapy in virologically suppressed people living with HIV. To the best of our knowledge this combination has not been studied before. METHODS: This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in treatment-experienced people with HIV who had HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL for at least two years. Patients received either tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir combination (26 patients) or a standard three-drug regimen (29 patients). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL during 48 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were CD4 cell count changes, the adherence rate, and adverse drug reactions, all over 48 weeks of study. RESULTS: HIV viral load remained undetectable (HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL) during the 48 weeks of the study in both arms. The absolute CD4 cell count change was not significant between the two groups. The overall proportion of adverse effects in each group was comparable. The rate of adherence to treatment was acceptable in both groups, and no significant difference was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment simplification with tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir regimen as maintenance therapy was non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety compared to the standard triple therapy. Comparing efficacy of antiretroviral therapy.

Real-life safety of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Bictegravir.

INTRODUCTION: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) are one of the most prescribed drug classes for the treatment of HIV infection worldwide. Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide/ Bictegravir (FTC/TAF/BIC) has been evaluated in randomized clinical trials; few studies have verified tolerability and safety in clinical practice. Our aim was to investigate the metabolic and hepatic safety in a real-life setting of FTC/TAF/BIC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive people living with HIV infection (PLWH) enrolled in the SCOLTA project, switching to or initiating their first antiretroviral treatment with FTC/TAF/BIC were included. PLWH with HBV co-infection were excluded. Metabolic and hepatic variables were collected at T0 and T1, were defined as baseline and 6-month follow-up respectively, and their modifications were analysed using the paired t-test and the analysis of variance. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-nine PLWH with at least one follow-up visit were included in the analysis. Mean age was 48 years (±12.1), 74% were male, 16.1% were naïve to antiretrovirals (ART). At T1, ART-experienced PLWH showed a significant reduction of total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides, and a slight increase in blood glucose (BG) and ALT. On the contrary, in ART-naïve PLWH blood lipids significantly increased, although with an unaffected TC/high density lipoprotein (HDL)-c ratio, while alanine aminotransferase (ALT) decreased significantly, mainly in those with altered baseline level. The treatment interruptions were 45 (8.4%) over the whole observation period, 13 (2.4%) due to AEs. The most frequent AEs were related to the central nervous system (6 events of depression, insomnia, headache, agitation) and 3 PLWH discontinued the regimen because of grade 1-2 weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: In ART-experienced PLWH switching to FTC/TAF/BIC a significant improvement of lipid profile occurred but with significant BG and ALT variation without clinical relevance. In ART-naïve PLWH, blood lipids increased even though lipid profile did not worsen, and a trend towards normalization of liver enzymes was suggested. FTC/TAF/BIC is well tolerated in the real life setting.

Safety and Efficacy of Long-Acting Injectable Agents for HIV-1: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: HIV-1 infection continues to affect global health. Although antiretrovirals can reduce the viral load or prevent HIV-1 infection, current drugs require daily oral use with a high adherence level. Long-acting antiretrovirals (LA-ARVs) significantly improve medication adherence and are essential for HIV-1 prophylaxis and therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of long-acting cabotegravir (CAB-LA) and long-acting rilpivirine (RPV-LA) in the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies from database inception to November 12, 2022. We included studies that reported efficacy and safety data on LA-ARV intervention in people living with HIV and excluded reviews, animal studies, and articles with missing or duplicate data. Virological suppression was defined as plasma viral load <50 copies/mL 6 months after antiviral therapy initiation. We extracted outcomes for analysis and expressed dichotomous data as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous data as mean differences. Depending on the heterogeneity assessment, a fixed- or random-effects model was used for data synthesis. We performed subgroup analyses of the partial safety and efficacy outcomes of CAB-LA+RPV-LA. The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework. RESULTS: We included 12 trials comprising 10,957 individuals, of which 7 were prevention trials and 5 were treatment trials. CAB-LA and RPV-LA demonstrated safety profiles comparable with those of the placebo in terms of adverse event-related withdrawal. Moreover, the efficacy data showed that CAB-LA had a better effect on HIV-1 prevention than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine (17/5161, 0.33% vs 75/5129, 1.46%; RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.61; I2=70%). Although CAB-LA+RPV-LA had more drug-related adverse events (556/681, 81.6% vs 37/598, 6.2%; RR 12.50, 95% CI 3.98-39.23; I2=85%), a mild or moderate injection site reaction was the most common reaction, and its frequency decreased over time. The efficacy of CAB-LA+RPV-LA was comparable with that of daily oral drugs at 48 and 96 weeks (1302/1424, 91.43% vs 915/993, 92.2%; RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.02; I2=0%), and a high level of virological suppression of 80.9% (186/230) was maintained even after 5 years of LA-ARV use. Similar efficacy outcomes were observed in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients (849/911, 93.2% vs 615/654, 94%; RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.02; I2=0%). According to the questionnaires, more than 85% of people living with HIV favored LA-ARVs. CONCLUSIONS: LA-ARVs showed favorable safety profiles for both the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection and were well tolerated. CAB-LA has more satisfactory efficacy than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine, significantly reducing the rate of HIV-1 infection. CAB-LA+RPV-LA maintains virological suppression for a long time and may be a viable switching strategy with enhanced public health benefits by reducing transmission. However, further trials are required to confirm the efficacy of these drugs.

Increased human immunodeficiency virus viral load with cerebral infarction due to varicella zoster virus vasculopathy on treatment with bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide suspension: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV) vasculopathy occasionally occurs in immunocompromised patients and is difficult to treat. The risk factor and optimal therapy remain unclear. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and dysphagia or difficulty in oral intake receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) suspension. However, there remains little evidence regarding ART suspension. CASE PRESENTATION: We experienced a case of a 55-year-old man diagnosed with HIV and severe multiple cerebral infarctions due to VZV vasculopathy. We started on bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (BIC/TAF/FTC) and acyclovir (ACV), and prednisone. He was started on BIC/TAF/FTC suspension because of deteriorated swallowing. The HIV viral load was increased; however, no drug-resistance genes were detected. We successfully treated him with doltegravir/abacavir/lamibudine suspension. We performed two literature reviews of the administration of BIC/TAF/3TC suspension and VZV vasculopathy in patients with HIV. Three cases of BIC/TAF/3TC suspension were considered treatment failures. Recent history of VZV infection and a CD4 count under 200 µL may be risk factors for VZV vasculopathy. The effective treatment may be using steroid and ACV; however, treatment duration could differ. CONCLUSIONS: BIC/TAF/FTC suspension administration may be unstable, and treating ACV and steroid may be optimal therapy for VZV vasculopathy; however, the evidence level is low.

[Sleep disorders related to HIV treatment.] / Trastornos en la calidad del sueño asociados a los inhibidores de la integrasa en el tratamiento del VIH.

OBJECTIVE: HIV Clinical Guidelines have positioned integrase inhibitors recently as first-line treatment. However, two of these drugs have also been associated with adverse side effects on the central nervous system, especially with sleep disturbances. The objective was to analyse the influence of bictegravir and dolutegravir on the sleep quality in HIV patients. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out between December 2020 and January 2021 in HIV patients attended in a pharmacy care clinic. Demographic and adherence variables were collected. Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh questionnaire or PSQI. We classified patients into two groups: patients with bictegravir or dolutegravir in their treatment (study group) and the rest (control group). The influence of the variables collected on the PSQI result was analysed using the Chi-Square test for categorical variables and the student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were included. 64% in the study group and 67% in the control group suffered from sleep disorders according to the PSQI questionnaire (p=0.788). Neither were statistical differences found when the different components of sleep were analysed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients, regardless of whether their treatment includes bictegravir or dolutegravir, have problems with their sleep quality. We didn't find a correlation between sleep quality and treatment with bictegravir or dolutegravir compared to the other treatments.

OBJETIVO: Los inhibidores de la integrasa se han posicionado recientemente en todas las Guías Clínicas de VIH como tratamiento antirretroviral de primera línea para el VIH. Sin embargo, dos de estos fármacos se han asociado también a efectos adversos a nivel del sistema nervioso central, concretamente con alteraciones del sueño. El objetivo del trabajo fue analizar la influencia de bictegravir y dolutegravir en la calidad del sueño en personas que viven con VIH (PVIH). METODOS: Se realizó un estudio observacional y transversal entre los meses de diciembre de 2020 y enero de 2021 en las PVIH de las consultas de atención farmacéutica del hospital. Se recogieron variables demográficas y de adherencia. La calidad del sueño se midió mediante el Cuestionario de Pittsburgh o PSQI. Las PVIH se clasificaron en 2 grupos: el grupo estudio, constituido por participantes con bictegravir o dolutegravir en su tratamiento, y el grupo control, integrado por el resto de PVIH. Se analizó la influencia de las variables recogidas sobre el resultado del PSQI mediante la prueba de chi cuadrado/odds ratio para variables categóricas y el de t de Student o U de Mann Whitney para variables continuas. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 119 PVIH, de las cuales un 64% en el grupo estudio y un 67% en el grupo control sufrían trastornos del sueño según el PSQI (p=0,788). Tampoco hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas cuando se compararon los diferentes componentes del sueño entre los dos grupos. CONCLUSIONES: Un elevado porcentaje de PVIH, independientemente de si el TAR incluye bictegravir o dolutegravir, tienen problemas relacionados con la calidad del sueño. No se encuentra correlación entre la calidad del sueño y el tratamiento con bictegravir o dolutegravir comparado con el resto de tratamientos.

Lipid profile changes associated with antiretroviral therapies in a real-world cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To compare lipid profile changes and cardiovascular events among HIV naïve and experienced patients from a real-world cohort treated with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate or dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study in HIV naïve and experienced people at a reference hospital in Spain was done. During the follow-up (March 2015-June 2019), patients were treated with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate or dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine. Epidemiological, clinical, and immunovirological variables were recorded. A statistical analysis of the lipid profile at baseline, 48, and 120 weeks after initiating the study therapy, cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, deep venous thrombosis, myocardiopathy, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), and cardiovascular risks factors was performed. Data were analysed in naïve and experienced patients from each of the study treatments. The data were obtained from the medical history. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v. 24 software. RESULTS: A total of 266 and 191 patients receiving treatment with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate and dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine were included in the study, respectively. After 120 weeks of treatment, a worsening of the lipid profile was found in the elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate group, both in naïve and experienced patients, whereas not so conspicuously observed in the dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine group. Statistically significant differences between both groups were found in experienced patients favouring dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine; in total cholesterol (204.1±38.2 vs. 187.3±29.4, P < .001) and LDL-C (126.1±31.9 vs. 113.5±28.5, P = .001) at week 48, and in total cholesterol (201.1±33.4 vs. 188.7±33.9, P = .013) and HDL-C (54.2±15.6 vs. 48.3±14.3, P = .01) at week 120. No significant differences in cardiovascular events were found, neither in naïve nor in experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS: The lipid profile among elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate group worsened throughout the follow-up, both in naïve and experienced patients, not so remarkable in the dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine group. Both regimens were well tolerated, with similar rates of cardiovascular events.